Data as of Sep 14, 2026 · Based on 337 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Use SiteGround for non-technical or small-client sites when you want quick setup, built-in email, and strong support so you can avoid server work. Use
Cloudways for growing or high-traffic clients that need higher performance, dedicated cloud resources, and pay-as-you-go pricing.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 87% of answers
Best for performance-focused or scaling clients: Cloudways delivers higher speed, dedicated cloud resources, and pay-as-you-go pricing for busy sites; tradeoff is more hands-on server management and migration nuance.
Named in 66% of answers
Named in 55% of answers
Named in 42% of answers
If you're a **web designer hosting websites for clients**, I’d generally choose **Cloudways over SiteGround**—but there’s an important distinction: > **SiteGround is better for simplicity. Cloudways is better for building a professional client-hosting business.** ### My recommendation
If you're a web designer hosting websites for clients, I’d generally choose Cloudways over SiteGround—but there’s an important distinction:
SiteGround is better for simplicity. Cloudways is better for building a professional client-hosting business.
| siteground.com | cloudways.com --- | --- | --- Best for | Simple small-business sites | Designers/agencies with multiple clients Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Performance/control | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Technical complexity | Low | Medium Email hosting | Yes | Usually separate White-label/agency use | Good | Excellent Pricing model | Per hosting plan | Per server/resources My pick for a web designer | Good | 🏆 Best
Cloudways is particularly attractive when you're managing 10, 20, 50+ client websites.
Its agency offering is explicitly designed around client portfolios: you can host multiple websites on one server, pay based on the server rather than each individual site, and scale resources as your portfolio grows. Cloudways also offers staging, cloning, backups, SSL, server-level security, and multiple infrastructure providers.
For example, Cloudways currently lets you choose infrastructure from DigitalOcean, Vultr, Linode, AWS, and Google Cloud, while managing the server through the Cloudways interface.
That gives you a lot more room to build your own hosting operation.
I'd structure it something like:
Your agency → Cloudways account → Server(s) → Client A website → Client B website → Client C website → Client D website
You can then charge clients something like:
Your actual hosting infrastructure can cost substantially less than the combined recurring revenue.
That's where Cloudways becomes particularly interesting for a web designer.
SiteGround is much easier for the average client.
Its current plans include things such as SSL, CDN, daily backups, email, free migration, WordPress management, staging on higher plans, collaborators and white-label access.
For a designer who says:
"I build 5–10 WordPress websites a year and just want somewhere easy to put them." I'd seriously consider SiteGround.
It's very approachable, and you don't need to think much about server architecture.
The current GoGeek plan, for example, includes unlimited websites, staging, Git, private DNS and white-label access.
Cloudways is not traditional shared hosting.
You're dealing with cloud servers and resource allocation. That gives you considerably more control, but you need to understand things like:
Cloudways does make this considerably easier than managing raw AWS/DigitalOcean yourself, but it is still more technical than SiteGround.
And pricing can become more complicated because Cloudways uses a pay-as-you-go model and additional resources/add-ons can affect the bill.
If you're serious about turning hosting into recurring revenue, I'd go:
For typical WordPress brochure/business websites, I'd start with Cloudways on DigitalOcean rather than jumping directly to AWS.
Then:
Cloudways → DigitalOcean server → Multiple WordPress sites → Cloudflare → automated backups → staging → client-specific WordPress installs
Cloudways currently advertises servers starting around $11/month for a 2GB/1-vCPU configuration, although actual cost depends on configuration/provider and any additional services.
That can make the economics very attractive when you're hosting multiple relatively low-traffic sites.
I'd pick SiteGround if:
I'd pick Cloudways if:
So if you're asking me, "Which one should I build my web-design business around?" → Cloudways.
If you're asking, "Which one is easiest for me and my small-business clients?" → SiteGround.
One thing I'd change from the typical designer setup, though: don't put every client on one giant server. I'd group clients by traffic/importance and keep higher-value or high-traffic clients isolated. That gives you better performance, security and damage containment if one site has a problem.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (5, 20, 50, 100+) and whether they're mostly WordPress, I can give you a specific Cloudways server setup and show you how much you could charge clients vs. your actual hosting cost.
You're dealing with cloud servers and resource allocation. That gives you considerably more control, but you need to understand things like:
Cloudways does make this considerably easier than managing raw AWS/DigitalOcean yourself, but it is still more technical than SiteGround.
And pricing can become more complicated because Cloudways uses a pay-as-you-go model and additional resources/add-ons can affect the bill.
For a web designer managing multiple client websites, choosing between **SiteGround** and **Cloudways** comes down to a fundamental trade-off: **convenience and managed hand-holding (SiteGround)** versus **scalability, performance isolation, and cost-efficiency at scale (Cloudways)**. Both run on top-tier cloud…
For a web designer managing multiple client websites, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: convenience and managed hand-holding (SiteGround) versus scalability, performance isolation, and cost-efficiency at scale (Cloudways).
Both run on top-tier cloud infrastructure (like Google Cloud), but their workflow, client-management models, and pricing structures are worlds apart.
SiteGround functions like a traditional, highly polished shared/cloud-hybrid host with a custom, user-friendly control panel (Site Tools).
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform . Instead of giving you a cPanel/shared space, they sit on top of cloud providers (DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud) and manage the server layer for you.
| Feature | SiteGround | Cloudways |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Solo designers with a few clients who want zero server stress. | Freelancers & agencies managing 5+ client sites looking for profit margins. |
| Hosting Model | Shared / Managed Cloud hybrid | Dedicated Cloud Servers (DigitalOcean, AWS, GCP) |
| Scaling Multiple Sites | Expensive (costs scale per account/plan limits) | Economical (bundle many low-traffic sites on one server) |
| Support Quality | Exceptional, instant live chat | Good, but more technical; relies on ticketing/chat |
| Email Hosting | Included free (cPanel style mailboxes) | Not included (requires third-party mail) |
To help narrow this down further:
As a web designer, choosing between **SiteGround** and **Cloudways** comes down to your business model, how you prefer to handle client billing, and your technical comfort level. Both are top-tier, but they serve completely different workflows. ### **SiteGround: The "Hands-Off & Beginner-Friendly" Route** SiteGround…
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to your business model, how you prefer to handle client billing, and your technical comfort level. Both are top-tier, but they serve completely different workflows.
SiteGround uses a customized, intuitive control panel and manages almost everything behind the scenes on shared/cloud-hybrid infrastructure.
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform. Instead of hosting sites directly, they sit on top of cloud infrastructure providers like DigitalOcean, AWS, or Google Cloud, giving you dedicated resources.
| Feature | SiteGround | Cloudways |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Solo designers doing "build and quit" handoffs | Designers building an agency/maintenance retainer model |
| Performance | Great out-of-the-box, but subject to shared limits | Superior, dedicated cloud resources |
| Client Handoff | Seamless account/site transfer | Harder to split individual sites into separate client bills |
| Email Hosting | Free and included | Not included natively (requires third-party like Google Workspace) |
To help narrow this down, tell me:
If you're a **web designer managing websites for clients**, I’d choose **SiteGround for most freelancers/small agencies**, and **Cloudways when performance, scalability, and server-level control become important**. ## My verdict | SiteGround | Cloudways
If you're a web designer managing websites for clients, I’d choose SiteGround for most freelancers/small agencies, and Cloudways when performance, scalability, and server-level control become important.
| SiteGround | Cloudways --- | --- | --- Best for | Designers, freelancers, small agencies | Agencies with growing/high-traffic sites Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ WordPress | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Server control | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ White-label | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client handoff | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Technical complexity | Low | Medium Hosting resale | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ My pick for most designers | 🏆 Yes | For advanced needs
For a web designer, hosting management shouldn't become a second job.
SiteGround's agency/reseller setup is particularly attractive because you can manage multiple client sites from one account, isolate sites from each other, give clients limited access, use white-label Site Tools, and transfer sites/billing between accounts.
Their current GoGeek/reseller offering also includes things designers actually care about: staging, backups, SSL/CDN, collaborators, white-label access, private DNS, and site isolation.
That's a very good combination if you're building primarily:
In other words, the typical $2k–$10k client website.
Cloudways becomes more compelling when you're building an agency with larger or more demanding websites.
Cloudways sits on top of cloud providers such as DigitalOcean, Vultr, Linode, AWS and Google Cloud, giving you considerably more flexibility in choosing and scaling infrastructure.
Its agency platform is designed around managing multiple client sites, with centralized management, staging, automated backups, role-based access, scaling, monitoring and the ability to run multiple applications on a server.
I'd choose Cloudways if you're dealing with:
The big advantage is that you're essentially getting managed cloud infrastructure without having to become a full-time Linux/server administrator.
Think of them this way:
SiteGround = "I want hosting to be easy."
Cloudways = "I want hosting to be powerful and scalable."
For a designer, I'd rather spend my time designing, building, getting clients and maintaining sites than worrying about server configuration.
That's why SiteGround wins for me for the average freelance web designer.
If your business model is:
"I build websites and then charge clients $50–$200/month for hosting + maintenance." Then I'd take a much closer look at SiteGround's reseller/agency offering.
SiteGround explicitly supports white-label hosting, custom hosting packages, client access, private DNS and recurring hosting revenue.
That makes it very easy to turn hosting into a recurring-revenue product rather than simply passing the hosting bill through to the client.
I'd probably structure it like this:
1–10 client websites: → SiteGround GoGeek
10–50 normal WordPress websites: → SiteGround GoGeek or Cloud
High-traffic / WooCommerce / demanding clients: → Cloudways
50+ sites / agency with technical expertise: → Cloudways + carefully sized cloud servers
And I wouldn't necessarily put every client on the same hosting solution. You can standardize your normal clients on SiteGround and move your demanding clients to Cloudways when their needs justify it.
Don't choose based primarily on the introductory price.
SiteGround currently advertises very aggressive introductory pricing, but the renewal prices are substantially higher. SiteGround Cloudways is more infrastructure-oriented, so the comparison is better made on total monthly cost per client, resources, management time, and what you can charge the client, rather than the headline promotional price.
Bottom line: SiteGround is my recommendation for a web designer; Cloudways is my recommendation for a web-development agency.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (e.g. 10, 25, 50, 100) and whether they're mostly WordPress, I can also break down exactly which SiteGround/Cloudways plan I'd use and what I'd charge each client per month.
If you’re a **web designer hosting websites for clients**, I’d generally choose **Cloudways over SiteGround**—but there’s an important exception. ### My recommendation | **Cloudways** | **SiteGround**
If you’re a web designer hosting websites for clients, I’d generally choose Cloudways over SiteGround—but there’s an important exception.
| Cloudways | SiteGround --- | --- | --- Best for | Agencies & freelancers | Small businesses & simple sites Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Server control | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ Email hosting | ❌ Separate | ✅ Included Support | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Pricing model | Pay for cloud resources | Hosting plan Long-term agency use | Excellent | Good
Cloudways gives you managed cloud infrastructure on providers such as DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS, Google Cloud and Linode, with dedicated server resources and scaling options.
SiteGround is much more of an all-in-one managed hosting experience. Its plans include things like email, SSL, CDN, backups, caching, WordPress management and support. Its GoGeek plan also includes staging, Git, private DNS and white-label access.
The biggest reason is how you can structure your client business.
Imagine you have 15 clients:
With Cloudways, you can put multiple relatively small WordPress sites on a cloud server and manage them from one platform. You're essentially selling managed hosting + maintenance, while Cloudways handles much of the server administration.
Cloudways also gives you dedicated cloud resources rather than the shared-hosting model used by SiteGround's standard plans. Independent 2026 comparisons generally find Cloudways stronger for agencies/developers, while SiteGround is easier for less technical users.
I'd choose SiteGround if your typical client is:
SiteGround is extremely convenient because so much is bundled together. Its current GrowBig plan, for example, supports unlimited websites and includes staging, backups, caching, email, SSL and other WordPress tools.
And SiteGround actually has an agency hosting program specifically designed around client sites, including collaborators, site ownership transfers and white-label functionality.
Renewal pricing.
The current promotional pricing looks fantastic—GrowBig is advertised at $4.99/month—but the listed renewal price is $29.99/month. GoGeek is currently $7.99/month promotional and renews at $44.99/month.
That's not necessarily bad, but it's something you need to account for when you're selling hosting to clients.
Cloudways uses a pay-as-you-go model, with the cost depending on the cloud provider/server configuration and any add-ons you use.
I'd actually structure it like this:
Small/simple client → SiteGround
Growing/high-traffic client → Cloudways
Agency with 10+ WordPress clients → Cloudways
WooCommerce/ecommerce → Cloudways
Performance-sensitive site → Cloudways
Client wants email + website in one place → SiteGround
You want to sell recurring hosting/maintenance → Cloudways
Don't make the mistake of choosing hosting based purely on "which is faster?"
For a web designer, the more important question is:
Which hosting platform makes it easiest for me to manage 20–50 client websites profitably? That's where Cloudways becomes much more interesting.
I'd also consider separating domain ownership, hosting, email and website maintenance rather than putting everything under your agency account. That makes client handoffs dramatically easier if a client ever leaves.
Bottom line:
🏆 Cloudways = my pick for a professional web designer/agency. 🥈 SiteGround = my pick for simplicity and smaller clients. If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (5, 10, 25, 50+) and whether they're mostly WordPress/Elementor, I can map out the most profitable Cloudways vs SiteGround setup—including what you'd charge each client per month and your potential hosting margin.
As a web designer, choosing between **SiteGround** and **Cloudways** comes down to balancing **ease of management** against **performance, scalability, and resource control** . Both are industry favorites, but they cater to entirely different agency workflows and client…
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to balancing ease of management against performance, scalability, and resource control . Both are industry favorites, but they cater to entirely different agency workflows and client types.
SiteGround: The Hands-Off, Client-Friendly Option
SiteGround operates on a custom-built, user-friendly control panel that abstracts away all server-level configurations. It is essentially traditional shared/cloud-hybrid hosting made sleek and fast.
Cloudways: The High-Performance, Scalable Powerhouse
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform. Instead of hosting you on their own servers, they deploy and manage cloud servers for you on top-tier infrastructure like DigitalOcean, AWS (Amazon Web Services), or Google Cloud.
Head-to-Head Comparison for Web Designers
| Feature | SiteGround | Cloudways |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Brochure sites, low-maintenance clients, solo designers | E-commerce, high-traffic sites, agency retainer models |
| Performance | Great (optimized, but shared limits) | Exceptional (dedicated cloud resources) |
| Client Hand-off | Easy (transfer ownership natively) | Moderate/Hard (better to keep billing under your account) |
| Email Hosting | Included free | Not included (requires 3rd party like Google Workspace) |
| Pricing Predictability | Rises steeply after year one | Pay-as-you-go hourly/monthly, highly predictable |
The Verdict: Which should you choose?
To explore their current plans and environment setups, you can check out SiteGround Hosting Plans or look over the infrastructure options on the Cloudways Platform.
If you want to narrow this down further, tell me:
If you’re a **web designer managing multiple client websites**, I’d generally pick **Cloudways over SiteGround**—but there’s an important exception. ## My quick verdict | **SiteGround** | **Cloudways**
If you’re a web designer managing multiple client websites, I’d generally pick Cloudways over SiteGround—but there’s an important exception.
| SiteGround | Cloudways --- | --- | --- Best for | Simple WordPress/client sites | Professional client portfolio Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client access | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scaling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Developer control | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ White-label/reselling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Email hosting | Yes | No Server flexibility | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Cost efficiency at scale | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ My pick for a web designer | Good | 🏆 Best
cloudways.com is specifically designed around the agency/client model. You can put multiple client websites on a server, manage them from one dashboard, create staging environments, control client/team access, and scale the server as your portfolio grows. Cloudways also lets you choose infrastructure from providers including DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud, Linode, and Vultr.
The big advantage is how you can structure your business:
Client websites → Cloudways → one centralized hosting operation → you manage everything → client gets access only to their website. That is a much better model once you're managing, say, 10–50+ websites.
Cloudways also charges based on the server rather than per website, so you can add multiple sites to a server as long as the resources are sufficient.
siteground.com is actually very good for designers, especially if you want the simplest possible managed WordPress experience.
SiteGround gives you:
Its Cloud plans also allow granular client access and custom hosting packages.
And there's one major difference: SiteGround includes email hosting, while Cloudways generally expects you to use a separate email provider. SiteGround's standard hosting plans include email accounts.
SiteGround.
It's incredibly convenient. You don't have to think much about servers, and the WordPress tooling is excellent.
For example, a typical setup could be:
SiteGround GrowBig/GoGeek → several client WordPress sites → you manage them → clients get collaborator access.
That's a very easy business model.
Cloudways. 🏆
This is where I think Cloudways becomes more compelling.
You can consolidate sites onto appropriately sized servers instead of treating every website as a separate hosting account. Cloudways specifically markets this model to agencies and supports centralized management, role-based access, staging, backups, scaling, and reselling.
Cloudways or SiteGround Cloud.
This is a different question from simply "where should I host my sites?"
You could charge something like:
Website Hosting & Maintenance — $99/month And include:
Your actual hosting cost can then become a relatively small component of the recurring revenue.
Both companies support this type of agency/reseller model. SiteGround's Cloud offering lets you create custom hosting packages and granular client access, while Cloudways explicitly supports agencies reselling hosting.
Don't compare SiteGround shared hosting vs Cloudways and conclude that SiteGround is necessarily "slower."
SiteGround's Cloud hosting is a much more serious product. It runs on Google Cloud, provides dedicated resources, autoscaling, staging, Git/SSH/WP-CLI, backups, CDN, and client-management capabilities.
So I'd think about it as:
SiteGround GrowBig/GoGeek → inexpensive, easy, excellent for small/medium client sites
SiteGround Cloud → premium managed agency hosting
Cloudways → flexible managed cloud infrastructure for an agency that wants to scale
I'd probably use Cloudways + Cloudflare + Google Workspace/Microsoft 365.
I'd keep domains separate from hosting.
I'd keep email completely separate from hosting.
And I'd sell clients a monthly maintenance/hosting package rather than giving every client a hosting account that you have to manage individually.
For example:
Your agency
→ Cloudways → Client A website → Client B website → Client C website → Client D website → Client E website
Then as you grow:
→ Server 1: small brochure sites → Server 2: larger/high-traffic sites → Server 3: WooCommerce/ecommerce sites
That gives you considerably more control over your margins and infrastructure.
Bottom line:
🥇 Cloudways — my choice for a professional web designer/agency managing a growing portfolio. 🥈 SiteGround — my choice if simplicity, WordPress convenience, and email hosting are more important than infrastructure flexibility. One caveat: Cloudways' current pricing/promotions and available infrastructure options change, so I'd base the final choice on how many sites you expect to host and their traffic, rather than the introductory price.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you have now (and expect within 1–2 years), I can give you a recommended Cloudways server size + estimated monthly cost + how much to charge each client.
For a web designer managing client websites, the "best" choice between SiteGround and Cloudways depends heavily on your **technical comfort level** , how you want to **bill your clients** , and the **scale of your business**. Both are top-tier platforms, but they operate on completely different philosophies:…
For a web designer managing client websites, the "best" choice between SiteGround and Cloudways depends heavily on your technical comfort level , how you want to bill your clients , and the scale of your business.
Both are top-tier platforms, but they operate on completely different philosophies: SiteGround is a streamlined, all-in-one shared/cloud hybrid built for ease, while Cloudways is a managed cloud platform built for raw performance, scalability, and developer control.
Summary Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
If you'd like to narrow this down further, tell me:
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: **convenience and managed hand-holding** versus **scalability, raw performance, and server control**. Both are top-tier choices, but they fit completely different workflow models for managing client websites.…
As a web designer, choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways comes down to a fundamental trade-off: convenience and managed hand-holding versus scalability, raw performance, and server control.
Both are top-tier choices, but they fit completely different workflow models for managing client websites.
SiteGround: The Plug-and-Play Choice
SiteGround is a traditional, premium shared/cloud host running on Google Cloud infrastructure, wrapped in a custom, highly polished control panel (Site Tools). [1]
Cloudways: The Scalable Powerhouse
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform . Instead of giving you a slice of a shared server, they sit on top of top-tier cloud infrastructure providers (DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud) and manage the server configuration for you. [1]
Side-by-Side Comparison for Designers
| Feature | SiteGround | Cloudways |
|---|---|---|
| Server Type | Shared / Managed Cloud | Dedicated Managed Cloud (AWS, DigitalOcean, GCP) |
| Pricing Model | Annual plans with high renewals | Flexible hourly/monthly pay-as-you-go |
| Client Handover | Very easy (friendly custom dashboard) | Moderate (requires clear instructions or keeping control yourself) |
| Email Hosting | Included free | Not included (must use third-party) |
| Agency Profitability | Lower (per-site strict caps & costs) | Higher (host dozens of small client sites on one server) |
The Verdict: Which should you choose?
To help narrow this down, tell me:
If you’re a **web designer managing websites for clients**, I’d lean **Cloudways overall**—but **SiteGround is better if you want maximum simplicity and low-touch management**. Here’s how I’d look at it from an agency/freelancer perspective. ## Quick verdict
If you’re a web designer managing websites for clients, I’d lean Cloudways overall—but SiteGround is better if you want maximum simplicity and low-touch management.
Here’s how I’d look at it from an agency/freelancer perspective.
| SiteGround | Cloudways --- | --- | --- Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Performance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Multiple client sites | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Client/agency management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Staging & cloning | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Technical control | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ White-label/client access | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Predictable simplicity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Value for growing agency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
For a web designer who might eventually manage 10, 20, 50+ client websites, Cloudways is the more attractive architecture. You can choose your underlying cloud provider, create multiple applications, clone sites/servers, use staging, scale resources, and manage multiple projects from one platform.
For example, Cloudways currently offers managed servers through providers including DigitalOcean and Vultr, with plans starting around $11/month for a 2GB/1-vCPU configuration.
That makes it particularly appealing when you want to treat hosting as part of your web-design business, rather than simply buying hosting for individual websites.
SiteGround is much easier for the average client.
Its standard hosting includes things such as SSL, CDN, daily backups, email, migrations, caching and 24/7 support. Its GrowBig and GoGeek plans also include staging, while GoGeek adds things such as white-label access and priority support.
That makes SiteGround excellent if your typical clients are:
You can essentially say:
"I'll build your website, host it, and take care of everything." And SiteGround makes that relatively painless.
Imagine you have 25 WordPress clients.
With Cloudways, you can organize applications/projects, clone sites, create staging environments, integrate Git, and scale server resources when necessary.
That's a much more developer/agency-oriented workflow.
It also gives you more architectural flexibility than traditional shared hosting. You're essentially putting your clients' websites on managed cloud infrastructure rather than simply putting everything into a conventional shared-hosting account.
That's the biggest reason I'd choose Cloudways as a web designer.
Cloudways is not necessarily cheaper for every client.
Its current Flexible plans start around $11/month for a small DigitalOcean configuration, but your actual cost rises as you select more resources, backups, add-ons, etc.
Meanwhile, SiteGround's advertised introductory pricing is extremely low—although its current published renewal prices are considerably higher. For example, GrowBig is advertised at $4.99/month initially and $29.99/month on renewal.
So don't compare the introductory prices directly.
If I were building a small-to-medium web design business today, I'd consider this model:
Client website → Cloudways → you manage hosting → client pays you monthly
For example:
Website build: $2,000 Hosting/maintenance: $75–150/month Includes: hosting + backups + updates + security + small maintenance allowance
Now hosting becomes a recurring revenue stream, rather than something you simply hand over to the client.
Cloudways is particularly well suited to this model because its platform is designed around multiple applications, teams, projects, staging, cloning and server management.
Interestingly, SiteGround Cloud is much more compelling for agencies than regular SiteGround shared hosting.
Their current Cloud offering starts at $100/month and includes unlimited websites, dedicated resources, automated scaling, white-label access, client roles, staging, Git, backups, CDN and priority support.
So I'd actually break the decision down like this:
If you're serious about becoming a web designer and hosting your clients' websites as an ongoing service, I'd choose Cloudways.
I'd start with a relatively modest server, put several low-traffic WordPress sites on it, establish your backup/security/maintenance workflow, and increase server resources as the portfolio grows.
SiteGround would be my choice if your priority is "make this ridiculously easy and don't make me think about infrastructure."
One more thing: don't automatically put every client on the same server. For higher-value or higher-traffic clients, I'd isolate them on their own server/application architecture so one client's traffic spike or problem doesn't become everyone else's problem.
If you tell me roughly how many client websites you expect to host (e.g. 5, 20, 50+) and whether they're mostly WordPress, I can map out the exact Cloudways vs SiteGround setup and what I'd charge each client per month.
Cloudways is not necessarily cheaper for every client.
Its current Flexible plans start around $11/month for a small DigitalOcean configuration, but your actual cost rises as you select more resources, backups, add-ons, etc.
Meanwhile, SiteGround's advertised introductory pricing is extremely low—although its current published renewal prices are considerably higher. For example, GrowBig is advertised at $4.99/month initially and $29.99/month on renewal.
So don't compare the introductory prices directly.
If I were building a small-to-medium web design business today, I'd consider this model:
Client website → Cloudways → you manage hosting → client pays you monthly
For example:
Website build: $2,000 Hosting/maintenance: $75–150/month Includes: hosting + backups + updates + security + small maintenance allowance
Now hosting becomes a recurring revenue stream, rather than something you simply hand over to the client.
Cloudways is particularly well suited to this model because its platform is designed around multiple applications, teams, projects, staging, cloning and server management.
Interestingly, SiteGround Cloud is much more compelling for agencies than regular SiteGround shared hosting.