Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 682 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Biotech and Health Service Providers
ParseChatGPT + Google AIParse
https://parse.gl
Measured across ChatGPT & Google AI
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSL PlasmaRoutinely cited alongside BioLife for plasma donor compensation. | Routinely cited alongside BioLife for plasma donor compensation. | 48% |
| 2 |  BioLife Plasma ServicesConsistently a top recommendation for paid plasma donations. | Consistently a top recommendation for paid plasma donations. | 48% |
| 3 |  Octapharma PlasmaFrequently listed as a primary option for plasma donors. | Frequently listed as a primary option for plasma donors. | 47% |
| 4 |  Grifols PlasmaA major player in paid plasma collection centers. | A major player in paid plasma collection centers. | 46% |
| 5 |  Atlas VentureA leading recommendation for early-stage biotech VC funding. | A leading recommendation for early-stage biotech VC funding. | 33% |
| 6 |  Third Rock Ventures | 28% | |
| 7 |  Flagship PioneeringFrequently named for its company-building approach to biotech. | Frequently named for its company-building approach to biotech. | 26% |
| 8 |  RA CapitalEmerged as a top-cited Boston biotech seed investor. | Emerged as a top-cited Boston biotech seed investor. | 26% |
| 9 |  KED Plasma | 25% | |
| 10 |  ADMA BioCenters | 22% | |
| 11 |  Polaris Partners | 20% | |
| 12 |  B Positive Plasma | 19% | |
| 13 |  SV Health Investors | 16% | |
| 14 |  Pillar | 16% | |
| 15 |  Mission BioCapital | 14% | |
| 16 |  MassVentures | 14% | |
| 17 | 12% | ||
| 18 | 11% | ||
| 19 |  F-Prime Capital | 11% | |
| 20 |  ImmunoTek | 10% | |
| 21 |  LabCentral | 10% | |
| 22 |  5AM Ventures | 9% | |
| 23 |  The Engine | 9% | |
| 24 |  Portal Innovations | 9% | |
| 25 |  Hub Angels | 9% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
rho.co is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 31% of analyzed answers.
Gained prominence between Nov 2025 and Mar 2026, becoming top-cited.
Emerged as a recommended scientific supplier starting in late 2025.
“A legitimate online source for peptides” → “A source of unapproved substances requiring safety and legal warnings”
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSL Plasma | 50% | 49% | |
| BioLife Plasma Services | 48% | 49% | |
| Grifols Plasma | 50% | 49% | |
| Octapharma Plasma | 50% | 49% | |
| Atlas Venture | 37% | 40% |
The two models disagree most about Polaris Partners (ChatGPT #17, Google #25).
Across 682 AI responses, CSL Plasma is mentioned most, named in 48% of them, followed by BioLife Plasma Services (48%) and Octapharma Plasma (47%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 682 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
Core PeptidesAI responses have pivoted from directly recommending vendors like 
Brands mentioned
Core Peptideswhere can i buy core peptides online?
AI responses have pivoted from directly recommending vendors like
BioLife Plasma ServicesCSL PlasmaGrifols PlasmaOctapharma PlasmaBioLife Plasma ServicesBrands mentioned
BioLife Plasma ServicesCSL PlasmaGrifols PlasmaOctapharma Plasmawhich brands pay me for plasma donations?
Answers to this prompt have been highly stable, consistently listing a core group of four national plasma collection centers. Both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews regularly name
